By “Software Engineering Productivity,” what exactly do we mean ?
This is a more complicated question than it first seems. Defining production can easily lead one to become obsessed with a single metric—e.g., lines of code, or revenue generated. Still, the complexity of things is far more than that. The following questions can help one to obtain a whole picture of productivity:
- How are creators doing? Stated differently, are they providing consistent, premium goods devoid of flaws or other issues?
- How may developer activity help the business? Here the emphasis will be on elements like customer pleasure, the lowering of cost, and the enhancement of the company profile by means of highly esteemed and trustworthy items.
- Which actions or outputs fit this situation? This question addresses the most directly quantifiable facets of developers’ labor. Lines of code, building counts, frequency of deployment, code reviews, incident mitigating statistics, etc., might all be measured in this field.
- Are developers working closely and talking with one another as advised? We clearly want to be assessing not only individual outcomes but also if the synergies made possible by good teamwork are being realized.
- Is work being done on schedule and with efficiency? Any company environment will have to balance the speed of production against the quality of products. This question tries to find whether this is done in the best possible way.
- Are developers getting enough attention? Long-term corporate success depends mostly on employee well-being and contentment. The productivity picture should thus also include determining whether developers are generally happy and adequately supported in their positions.
Get deep knowledge on how the low-code platform can enable your company to apply IBM trends in contemporary software development and digital transformation.
Why Should Businesses Track Software Engineer Productivity ?
Software development most clearly fits the cliché “What gets measured, gets done”. This is not a field for us to just wish for the best. It should go without saying to ensure that inputs—in terms of developer time and effort—match output. Measurement will also show up in the locations of bottleneck occurrence. This can then result in targeted actions so that efforts and procedures may be simplified and synchronized. Finally, time is money in some sense. A good bottom line so depends on measurement as well. Specifically in terms of making sure your business makes a good return on investment on the expense of hiring developers. It should be underlined that IBM i monitoring can help to reach this goal.
List some instances of metrics used in software engineering.
It should not be surprising that over the years a wide spectrum of measures have been produced. For individual developers, these are some of the most crucial ones:
- Number of commits: Counts the commits done to a file
- Average commit size: Evaluates the extent of modifications to a file going beyond the absolute count of commits.
- Review time: Measures responsiveness to the demand for file work on a project.
- Key indicator of how efficient and “clean” code is: number of code reviews
- Like the above, but with an eye toward how often corrective action is required, frequency of code reviews.
Apart from these steps, those apply to individual developers as well; so, team performance should also be given enough consideration. The rate at which teams create functional and valuable software should take front stage in this area. At a team level, financial indicators—such as total spending against income generated—can also be more effectively utilized.
Why Sometimes Are Efforts to Measure Software Engineering Output So Difficult ?
Seeking to fix a problem, humans are quite prone to try and grasp for “magic bullets”. Still, we have to accept that reality is really more complicated than we first thought. This is absolutely accurate in terms of software development productivity measurement. There is just no one size fits all option even with the profusion of measurements. This is mostly because calculating the value of the actions—e.g., lines of code—is not exactly the same as counting the number of actions. Some developers can provide better software using significantly fewer lines of code than employed in the output of less effective rivals. Furthermore, there is the recurring issue whereby almost every measuring system may be “gamed”. Stated differently, some developers will concentrate so heavily on the particular action under measurement that their efforts in other areas will suffer.
Which appropriate metrics of software engineering productivity should we use ?
The above-described elements help many managers to choose measurements that concentrate considerably more on end results than on processes. Stated differently, our main priorities should be issues including return on investment, customer pleasure, and developer welfare. Stated differently, we should do our best to maximize the precious time of developers (as well as to get a decent return on investment from it) and also as much as possible support their welfare. The truth is that developers who have suitable tools, operate under well-defined expectations, and are satisfied with their work will be more efficient. Any measurements we create should serve these goals; else, we risk being lost in meaningless bean-counting activities quite easily.
